Intercultural Communication and Translation News

As we know, translation metaphors abound. Some bring us closer to the truth, some confuse and confound. The nature of translation makes it difficult to understand the phenomenon, hence the countless number of metaphors which are often contradictory. On the one hand, translators are asked to be as faithful as possible, but on the other hand, they are told to never translate word-for-word. Translators are told to mirror the text often in an almost mechanical way, yet the very task of translation is itself extremely creative.

Thus, the question that really interests translation theorists is whether the translation process is a ‘primary’ or ’secondary’ process. Is translation ‘creation’ or is it ‘recapitulation’? If, on the one hand, we assume that translation is a ‘primary’ process then the question of authorship is paramount - the translator is the ‘creator’ of the text, a ‘co-author’ of sorts. If, on the other hand, the process is ’secondary’ then the ‘creativity factor’ is of less import and, in effect, the focus is on the source rather than the target text.

Read more >  transubstantiation

Related posts:

1. The language of ignorance It has become a common misconception, amongst a large...
2. Global search optimization and translation As the evolution of the Internet continues, b-to-b marketers...
3. English is foreign for 40% of primary school kids Schools are struggling to cover the cost of providing...
4. Software translation project launched by the African localisation company The localisation company, Translate.org.za, have launched a year long...
5. Brown orders review of asylum rules for Iraqi interpreters The government is to review the cases of Iraqi...

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 16th, 2008 at 8:47 am and is filed under Translation News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.